(example)

Verified Affidavit in the Truth

Notice for the Public Record

Whereas, an unrefuted affidavit noticed for the public record is the highest form of evidence, I am hereby timely creating public record
by declaration with the following"Verified Affidavit in the Truth" by seasonable and timely notice, establishing factual evidence, and
establishing estoppel in order of protecting my rights and my private property.

I hereby and herein declare that I am competent and of age for testifying. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein. The facts
stated herein and stated under penalty of perjury by the Laws of God, my creator, and by the laws of the United States of America, the
perpetual union of sovereign states combined within the union of states. I have verified the facts stated herein as being true, correct, complete,
certain and not misleading by signing and sealing my affidavit before a Public Notary as an authentic act.

The following facts are being duly noticed for the public record concerning (FIRST & LAST NAME), as referenced by your Complaint No
_________. Notice to principal is notice to agent. Notice to agent is notice to principal. I hereby and herein declare and proclaim, by good faith,
with clean hands and at arm's length, the following:

1) On December 23rd 2008, (FIRST & LAST NAME) was traveling on the public right-of-way, conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner,
neither interfering with or disturbing the Rights of another, when Officer (first & last name) of the (city) Police Department proceed to violate
(FIRST & LAST NAME)'s reserved God given and constitutionally guaranteed right to liberty and public
vehicular travel on the common way.

2) (FIRST & LAST NAME) was exercising his right to public vehicular travel when Officer (last name) proceed to turn on his warning lights and pull him
over and begin the harassment. (FIRST & LAST NAME), understood that it was the intention of Officer (last name) to deprive him of his personal
private property, (i.e. financial consideration) and therefore cooperated so that no other rights might by violated by Officer (last name). And
presumably since a "complaint" was issued it was clearly the intention of Officer (last name) to deprive (FIRST & LAST NAME) of financial
consideration for the alleged violations. Such financial considerations are also his reserved private property.
All of this was conducted under the color of law and without any probable cause or due process.

3) The definition of personal liberty is:

"Personal liberty largely consists of the Right of Locomotion - to go where and when one please, only so far restrained as the Rights of
others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other people. The Right of the people to travel upon the public highways and to transport his
private property thereon, by horse drawn carriage wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but
the common Right which he has under his Right to life and liberty, and pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guarantee one may,
therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in the public places, and while conducting himself in an
orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another's Rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe
conduct." [emphasis added] II Am.jur (1st) Constitutional law, sect.329 p.1135

and further...

" Personal liberty- consists of the power of locomotion, of changing situations, of removing one's person to whatever place one's inclination
may direct, without imprisonment or restraint unless by due process of law." 1 Blackstone's commentary 134: Hare, Constitution_.&&&: Bovier"s
law dictionary, 1914 ed., Black's law dictionary, 5th ed.

4) This concept is further amplified by the following elaboration of personal liberty:
"Personal liberty, or the right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental of natural, which has been protected by its inclusion as
a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which many not be submitted to a
vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. "It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to
private property... and is regarded as unalienable." C.J.S. Constitutional law, sect. 202, p.987.

5) Whereas (FIRST & LAST NAME) is not a resident of the state of __________ or a U.S. citizen but a Sovereign American National, he is therefore not
subject to your jurisdiction concerning the (state) vehicle code, or any other laws which are ultra vires to the Supreme Law of the Land which is
the U.S. Constitution.

6) Whereas (FIRST & LAST NAME) has no reason to enter into a contract with the State of _________ by accepting an offer of contract entitled
(Title of ticket or complaint document) or any other contract related to this complaint and reserves all his Rights!

7) Whereas (FIRST & LAST NAME) is a Sovereign American National who reserves ALL of his God given and Constitutionally protected Rights including
the Right to Liberty which clearly includes the right to travel freely and unencumbered, the following court cases establish beyond the shadow of
any reasonable doubt that the "State cannot diminish the Rights of the People" (Hertado v. California, 110 US 516) and that "The claim and
exercise of a Constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime" (Sherer v. Cullen, 481 f 946). Therefore the State of Arizona and
Yavapai County have no jurisdiction and no case against (FIRST & LAST NAME). And this complaint# 38978 must be dismissed because of
(FIRST & LAST NAME)s claim and exercise of his God given and constitutionally guaranteed Rights cannot be converted into a crime and no sanction
or penalty can be imposed for this lawfully action on his part.

8) It is further established by the following citations of case law that since (FISRT & LAST NAME) has reserved and secured his God given and
Constitutionally guaranteed Rights that they cannot be defeated or abrogated. "The assertion of the federal rights, when plainly and
reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice." (Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US 22, at 24) and " Where rights
secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogated them."
(Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491.) And finally, "Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principals of common right and common
reason are null and void." (Bennet v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60) Therefore complaint # 38978 must be dismissed because any statute or regulation
which violates (FIRST & LAST NAME)'s common and God given rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution is necessarily null and void.

9) Whereas Officer (last) and City Attorney (last) were duly noticed on February 2nd 2009 with an Acceptance of their Oath of Office by
Certified mail #_________________ #________________, they now have a binding bilateral contract to uphold and defend the God given and
Constitutionally guaranteed rights of (FIRST & LAST NAME), therefore no witness can be presented to testify against him. For Officer (last) or
City Attorney (last) to testify against (FIRST & LAST NAME) would be to dishonor their solemn oath of office and would be a breach of good faith and
repugnant to the Constitution of (state) and of the United States of America. Therefore this complaint # _______ must be dismissed for lack of
evidence.

10) Finally, in article six of the U.S. Constitution:
"This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof:...shall be the Supreme Law of the
Land: and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary
notwithstanding." Also in the same Article, it says just who within the government is bound by this Supreme Law:

" The senators and representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and
judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation to support this
Constitution...."
Therefore, if we are to follow the letter of the law, (which every public servant has sworn to do!) this places official who involve themselves
in such unlawful acts in an unfavorable legal situation. For it is a felony and a Federal crime to violate or deprive people of the constitutionally
protected rights. This system of law dictates only two ways to legally remove a rigth belonging to the people: 1) by lawfully amending the constitution
or 2) by a person knowingly waiving a particular right. And since there have been no legal amendments limiting freedom, liberty and the right to travel,
and since (FIRST & LAST NAME) has not knowingly waived any of his rights with respect to complaint # ____ we will consider this matter completely
dismissed, discharged and closed without any recourse or repercussion pending the (10) business days provided for below.

If any man or woman wishes to respond to or rebut the foregoing "Verified Affidavit in the Truth", or has information that would controvert and
overcome the foregoing "Verified Affidavit in the Truth", he or she is required to make such a responce or rebuttal, using only facts based on first-hand,
personal knowledge, within ten business day of receipt by written, controverted, counter-affidavit form, signed under penalty of perjury, before a Public
Notary, using his/her Christian name, controverting and overcoming each and every point of the foregoing "Verified Affidavit in the Truth", proving with
particularity by stating all requisite actual evidentiary fact and all requisite actual law and not merely the ultimate facts or conclusions of law, that my
facts are substantially and materially false sufficient for changing my factual declarations. Thre foregoing "Verified Affidavit in the Truth", is an
instrument in commerce, and I hereby and herein explicitly reserve all my rights without recourse. In commerce, an unrefuted affidavit noticed on the
Public Record is the highest form of evidence. Your silence stands as consent to, and tacit approval of, the factual declarations herein being
established as fact and the foregoing "Verified Affidavit in the Truth", will stand as final judgmentin this matter. Failure to respond, nihil dicit, within
ten business days of receipt establishes your unconditional acceptance of the foregoing facts and the dismissal, closure and cancellation of this
matter.


Verification: I verify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at arm's
length, on the ____day of the ____ month in the year of our Lord, two thousand six, at the county of_________, in the state of _______.


By: me. addressee: (FIRST NAME), family of (last) a Sovereign

_____________________________


Notary: _____________________________ Seal


Witness: _____________________________


Witness: _____________________________

Authentication

The United States of America, the perpetual union of sovereign

states combined to form a constitutional republic on the soil of Arizona,

a sovereign state within the perpetual union of states.

Notice of Acceptance of Oath of Office

Notice of Acceptance of Oath of Office

By: me, addressee: (first name), family of (last), a Sovereign National.
[address]


Notice for: Officer and or DA (first & last name), (city) Police department
(Address, city, state, zip)
vai certified mail: #____________

Notice for: CLERK OF THE COURT, for placing in the sovereign's folder for public notice

c/o (City) Courts, (Address, city, state, zip)
via Certified Mail: #_____________

I hereby duly notice Officer and or DA (first & last name), d/b/a Officer (first & last name), (city) POLICE/PUBLIC
SERVANT, with my instrument entitled, "Notice of acceptance of oath of office", concerning his complaint # ______


OFFICER AND OR DA (FIRST & LAST NAME) (CITY) POLICE/PUBLIC SERVANT, I hereby and herein
accept your oath of office as your open and binding offer of contract to form a firm and binding, private,
bilateral contract between you and me in which you agree to perform all of your promises and uphold all of my
rights.

Further, I hereby and herein claim my right to common law jurisdiction and refuse statutory jurisdiction.

The foregoing "Notice of Acceptance of the Oath of Office" is an instrument in commerce and is made explicitly
under reserve and without recourse. Failure to respond to this offer of contract within three business days of
receipt establishes your unconditional acceptance of the foregoing and your promise to uphold all of my rights.


Verification: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America
that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at arm's length, on the ___ day of the___month in
the year of our Lord, two thousand,___, at the county of _________.


By: By: me, addressee: (first name), family of (last),
a Sovereign National.

Witness:_____________________

Witness:_____________________

Opt. Appearence form

Optional Appearance, via Registered Mail, for the
Limited Purpose of Accepting for Value the Charges
Notice by: (first name), , family of (last)
Address
city, State zip
Notice, by Optional Appearance, for:
(name of judge),, d/b/a _________ COUNTY COURT JUDGE
c/o CITY OF ________
city, State zip
via Registered Mail: “________”, Return Receipt Requested
The following “Optional Appearance, via Registered Mail, for the Limited Purpose of Accepting for Value the Charges” is made explicitly under reserve and without recourse.
In the matter of: THE STATE OF _______ Citation No. _______
In the name of God, amen. I, me, addressee: (first name), family of (last), a sovereign without the UNITED STATES, hereby give notice (name of judge), d/b/a (name of judge), MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE for the CITY OF ________, of my acceptance for value, by optional appearance, of the charges stated in THE STATE OF _________ Citation No. ________. I am a belligerent claimant of all of my rights. I deny I am a corporation. I deny I am a beneficiary of the Trust known as "THE STATE OF _______". Notice to the agent is notice to the principal. Notice to the principal is notice to the agent.
(name of judge) , d/b/a (name of judge), MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE for the CITY OF __________, I want to pay you the honor and respect you deserve by accepting your Oath of Office. I am proud that when you said “so help me God”, you promised the people of Arizona that you would uphold the Constitution for the United States of America and the Constitution for Arizona, and that in your private contract with me, you have promised to protect all of my rights found at the Bill of Rights at the Constitution for Arizona. I am proud that you have promised to protect all of my rights, and I trust you will honor your private contract with me and not allow any third-party agents to interfere in your duty to me.
Acceptance for Value of the Agent’s Offer of Contract
Staying in honor, I, me, addressee:(first name), family of (last), a sovereign without the UNITED STATES, hereby and herein accept for value and consideration, your presentment, along with all of the charges contained therein, in return for discharge, settlement and closure of STATE OF __________ Citation No. ________, and AUTOTRIS Account No. _______, and CUSIP Account No. _______. Social Security No. ___-__-____. Please use my exemption for the discharge, settlement and closure of this account as this account is pre-paid and exempt from levy. If you need me to sign the Appearance Bond, or any other exempt exchange item in order to discharge the debt, just let me know.
Request for Copy of the Bond(s) Underwriting the Action(s) Claimed
I hereby and herein duly request a copy of all bonds underwriting the action(s) claimed. With that information, I can provide any exemption instruments you may need in order to fully and completely discharge the bonds at STATE OF _________ Citation No. ______, and AUTOTRIS Account No. _______, and CUSIP Account No. _______.
The foregoing is an instrument under contract law, and I hereby and herein explicitly reserve all of my rights without recourse. Failure to respond, nihil dicit, within three business days of receipt, establishes your unconditional acceptance of the foregoing.
You have been noticed.
Verification: I verify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed, at arm’s length, on the ____th day of the ____th month in the year of our Lord, two-thousand, ____, at the county of _________.
Attachments: Original instrument/presentment, attached hereto and made a part hereof, entitled: “CITATION”, numbered _______, duly marked: “Staying in honor, I hereby Accept for Value and Consideration, your presentment, along with the charges contained therein, in return for full discharge, settlement and closure of STATE OF ________ Citation No. ________, and AUTOTRIS Account No. _______, and CUSIP Account No. ________”
Dated: _____, A.D. 200___ Endorsement: _______________
By: (first name), family of (last),
&n bsp; a sovereign without the UNITED STATES,
&n bsp; acting as the Authorized Representative

Notarty: ____________________Seal

Witnessed by: _________________________
Witnessed by: _________________________

Costitutional Right Travel form

County of _______

OFFICE OF THE CLERIC
City , State

COMMON LAW VEHICULAR JUDICIAL NOTICE

CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO TRAVEL

THE UNDERSIGNED Common Law Citizen (first name), family of (last name): hereby Certifies, by Rights Secured under provisions of the Constitution of the United States of America, the Constitution of the several states, Common Law, Nature and Laws of Natures GOD, that these Rights are retained in FEE SIMPLE ABSOLUTE, and held and protected with special regard to Rights designated and/or set forth as follows: ALSO NOTE Rights and Property are ONE AND THE SAME THING-by the Honorable Justice LOUIS BRANDIS U.S. SUPREME COURT.
NOTICE AND ADVISORY OF RIGHTS CLAIMED INVIOLATE:

1) The Right to TRAVEL FREELY, UNENCUMBERED, and UNFETTERED is guaranteed as a RIGHT and not a mere privilege. That the Right to TRAVEL is such a BASIC RIGHT it does NOT even need to be mentioned for it is SELF-evident by Common Sense that the Right to TRAVEL is a BASIC CONCOMMITANT of a FREE Society to come and go from length and breath FREELY UNENCUMBERED and UNFETTERED distinguishes the characteristic required for a FREE PEOPLE TO EXIST IN FACT. Please See SHAPIRO vs. THOMSON, 394 U. S. 618 . Further, the Right to TRAVEL by private conveyance for private purposes upon the Common way can NOT BE INFRINGED. No license or permission is required for TRAVEL when such TRAVEL IS NOT for the purpose of [COMMERCIAL] PROFIT OR GAIN on the open highways operating under license IN COMMERCE. The above named Common Law Citizen listed IS NOT OPERATING IN COMMERCE and as such is thereby EXEMPTED FROM THE REQUIREMENT OF A LICENSE AS SUCH. Further, the Arizona state, is FORBIDDEN BY LAW from converting a BASIC RIGHT into a PRIVILEGE and requiring a LICENSE and or a FEE CHARGED for the exercise of the BASIC RIGHT. Please SEE MURDOCK vs. PENNSYLVANIA, 319 U.S. 105, and if Arizona state does ERRONIOUSLY convert BASIC RIGHTS into PRIVILEGES and require a License or FEE a Citizen may IGNORE THE LICENSE OR FEE WITH TOTAL IMMUNITY FOR SUCH EXERCISE OF A BASIC RIGHT. Please see Schuttlesworth vs. BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA, 373 U.S. 262. Now if a Citizen exercises a BASIC RIGHT and a Law of ANY state is to the contrary of such exercise of that BASIC RIGHT, the said supposed Law of ANY state is a FICTION OF LAW and 100% TOTALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL and NO COURTS ARE BOUND TO UPHOLD IT AND NO Citizen is REQUIRED TO OBEY SUCH UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW OR LICENSE REQUIREMENT. Please see MARBURY vs. MADISON, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), which has never been overturned in over 194 years, see Shephard's Citations. Now further, if a Citizen relies in good faith on the advice of Counsel and or on the Decisions of the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT that Citizen has a PERFECT DEFENSE to the element of WILLFULNESS and since the burden of proof of said WILLFULNESS is on the Prosecution to prove beyond a REASONABLE DOUBT, said task or burden being totally impossible to specifically preform there is NO CAUSE OF ACTION FOR WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED BY A COURT OF LAW. Please see U.S. vs. Bishop 412 U.S. 346 . OBVIOUSLY THERE IS NO LAWFUL CHARGE AGAINST EXERCISING A BASIC Right to TRAVEL for a regular Common Law Citizen NOT IN COMMERCE on the common way Public HlGHWAY. THAT IS THE LAW!!! The above named Citizen IS IMMUNE FROM ANY CHARGE TO THE CONTRARY AND ANY PARTY MAKING SUCH CHARGE SHOULD BE DULY WARNED OF THE TORT OF TRESPASS!!! YOU ARE TRESPASSING ON THIS Common Law Citizen!!!
2) The original and Judicial jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court is ALL actions in which a State may be party, thru subdivision, political or trust. This includes ALL state approved subdivisions and/or INCORPORATED Cities, Townships, Municipalities, and Villages, Et Al . Please see Article 3, Section 2, Para. (1) and (2), U.S. Constitution.
3) The undersigned has NEVER willingly and knowingly entered into ANY Contract or Contractual agreement giving up ANY Constitutional Rights which are secured by the CONSTITUTION, the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. This Common Law Citizen has NOT harmed any party, has NOT threatened any party, and that includes has NOT threatened or caused any endangerment to the safety or well being of any party and would leave any claimant otherwise to their strictest proofs otherwise IN A COURT OF LAW. The above named Citizen is merely exercising the BASIC RIGHT TO TRAVEL UNENCUMBERED and UNFETTERED on the Common public way or highway, which is their RIGHT TO SO DO!!! Please see Zobel vs. Williams, 457 U.S. 55, held the RIGHT TO TRAVEL is Constitutionally PROTECTED!!
4) Conversion of the RIGHT TO TRAVEL into a PRIVILEGE and or CRIME is A FRAUD and is in clear and direct conflict with she UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. LAWS made by any state, which are clearly in direct CONFLICT or REPUGNANCY are UNCONSTITUTIONAL and are NOT WITH STANDING IN LAW AND ARE BEING CHALLENGED AS SUCH HERE AND THEREBY ARE NULL AND VOID OF LAW ON THEIR FACE. NO COURTS ARE BOUND TO UPHOLD SUCH FICTIONS OF LAW AND NO Citizen is bound to obey such a FICTION OF LAW. SUCH REGULATION OR LAW OPERATES AS A MERE NULLITY OR FICTION OF LAW AS IF IT NEVER EXISTED IN LAW. No CITIZEN IS BOUND TO OBEY SUCH UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW!!!!!
5) The payment for a privilege requires a benifit to be received As the RIGHT TO TRAVEL is already secured it is clearly unlawful to cite any charges without direct damage to the specific party . Nor may a Citizen be charged with an offense for the exercise of a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, in this case the RIGHT TO TRAVEL. Please see Miller vs. UNITED STATES 230 F2d 486 . Nor may a Citizen be denied DUE PROCESS OF LAW or EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW.
6) The undersigned does hereby claim, declare, and certify ANY AND ALL their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS INVIOLATE from GOD and secured in THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION and the CONSTITUTION OF THE state wherein they abode as a SOVEREIGN, COMMON LAW CITIZEN existing and acting entirely AT THE COMMON LAW, and retains ALL BASIC RIGHTS under the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATURE AND NATURE'S GOD AND UNDER THE LAWS OF GOD THE SUPREME LAW GIVER.
7) ANY VIOLATOR OF THE ABOVE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND CLAIM IS CRIMINALLY TRESPASSING UPON THIS ABOVE NAMED COMMON LAW Citizen and WILL BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT UNDER THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. BE WARNED OF THE TRESPASS AND THE ATTACHED CAVEATS. ALSO TAKE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE, IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NOT AN EXCUSE!!
SIGNATURE OF THE ABOVE NOTED Common Law Citizen is signed_________________________________________
WITNESS________________________________________ Date_______________
WITNESS________________________________________ Date_______________
or
NOTARY PUBLIC_________________________________ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES____________________________

Form below use for County Clerk
state of _________
COUNTY OF_______________
1, ___________________________________, CLERK of the County of
_____________________________________, thereof do hereby certify the
Citizen above named has sworn to the contents of this document and that
same is TRUE AND CORRECT. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have
hereto set my hand and affixed the SEAL of said CIRCUIT COURT, at
the City of __________________________________ , (State) this
________________day of_______________________, AD.__________
______________________________________Deputy County Clerk for
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________COUNTY CLERK

Sovereign Right to Travel

RIGHT TO TRAVEL VS DRIVERS LICENSE

As a Sovereign you have the right to travel WITHOUT a drivers license IF it is for personal use and not for commercial. Anyone conducting commercial business must have a license! That is the law! Check out these links and learn more.

http://www.barefootsworld.net/sui_juris/right_to_travel.html

http://www.publicvehiculartravel.com/

http://web.archive.org/web/20010221144001/http:/user.icx.net/~drherb/licensing.html

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/travel.htm